Rental Market’s Big Buyers

Private-Equity Giant Blackstone’s $1 Billion Bet on Foreclosed Family Homes

By Craig Karmin, Robbie Whelan, and Jeannette Neuman

The Wall Street Journal – Blackstone Group LP has become the biggest U.S. investor in single-family rental homes by spending more than $1 billion since the start of 2012 to acquire more than 6,500 foreclosed houses in eight metropolitan areas, according to people briefed by Blackstone.

The firm also is finalizing a loan for at least $300 million from Deutsche Bank to support this business, these people said.

Numerous private-equity firms have crowded into the business, some as early as last year, looking for a way to bet on the recovery of the housing market. Blackstone’s growing commitment to this strategy offers fresh evidence that the purchases of foreclosed homes, which began as a mom-and-pop pursuit, is gaining legitimacy among the biggest private-equity firms.

The demand from these firms and other investors could help strengthen the housing recovery, analysts say. Earlier this year, the Federal Reserve expressed support for the strategy as a way to clear the backlog of foreclosures that has weighed down the market.

People involved in the market estimate that private-equity firms and other investors have raised $6 billion to $8 billion to invest in the sector, as they try to take advantage of prices that have fallen nationwide on average by more than a third. That could buy 40,000 to 80,000 properties, according to a recent report from Keefe Bruyette & Woods.

Of course, success is by no means assured for private-equity firms, especially given their high targets for investment returns in general and their lack of experience with this type of real estate. Used to buying office buildings, shopping centers and other big properties, they may struggle to find economies of scale in managing thousands of individual homes in neighborhoods that were hard-hit by foreclosures, but are showing signs of price stabilization.

Skeptics also have pointed out that bulk sales of repossessed homes are rarer and smaller than many investors had hoped. In many markets, firms are battling small investors at foreclosure auctions on courthouse steps, buying properties one by one, a tedious process. There also is little precedent for selling thousands of homes en masse, something the firms will need to do to cash out.

Blackstone and other firms are expanding rapidly partly because the housing market is firming up. In some markets, home prices have risen to the point that firms might not be able to achieve their initial return objectives from renting them out.

“I believe the smart thing to do is to ramp up really quickly, because I think the dynamics are going to change dramatically in the next 12 months,” said John Burns, an Irvine, Calif.-based housing consultant. “We’re going to see a lot of price appreciation at the low end of the market, which means lower cash yields.”

Among the private-equity firms crowding into the single-family home market are Colony Capital LLC, Oaktree Capital Group LLC, KKR, GTIS Partners and Och-Ziff Capital Management LLC, which have invested less money and bought fewer homes. On Wednesday, Waypoint Real Estate Group LLC, a real-estate investment firm in the single-family rental market, said it had secured a $245 million loan from Citigroup Inc., C -2.20% to expand its portfolio of more than 2,400 homes.

“We’re finally starting to see the private sector coming in and providing a solution. It was just equity and now it’s debt. We’re seeing meaningful price appreciation in a number of markets across the country,” as investors buy up more homes, said Waypoint managing director Gary Beasley.

But Blackstone, one of the biggest buyout firms in the world, has been able to muscle its way to the front of the pack by taking advantage of the $13.3 billion property fund it closed last month, the largest of its kind ever raised, and has already spent about one-third of it, say people who have spoken with Blackstone. It has paid an average of about $140,000 for each home in Phoenix, southern and northern California, Atlanta, Miami, Tampa and Chicago. Like other investors in this market, the firm is planning to fix up the homes, rent them and eventually sell them after the market rebounds.

Blackstone has previously said it expects to achieve initial yields of 6% to 7% on the rental income. But the firm also will need rents and home values to rise if it is going to hit the double-digit returns that it typically promises its investors.

Private-equity firms also are looking to boost returns by putting leverage on their portfolios. Blackstone is close to finalizing a loan from Deutsche Bank AG for $300 million, an amount that could expand to as much as $600 million, the people said. The loan is the largest made to a private-equity fund for this strategy so far, executives at several firms say.

As private-equity firms enter the single-home market, they have partnered with local property companies to buy, lease and manage properties. Blackstone, for example, has partnered with Dallas-based Riverstone Residential Group and Tempe-based Treehouse Group to form a new company, called Invitation Homes, to manage its single-family rental business.

Single-Family Rental Houses Draw Millions Impacted by Foreclosure Crisis

By Teke Wiggin

After splitting from her husband, Tami Wingfield couldn’t afford to keep up with the mortgage on the home that they had shared. The monthly $1,600 bill was too much for her to bear alone, and in 2008, she lost the house to foreclosure.

Like many people who lost their homes in the housing collapse, Wingfield decided the next logical step was to rent. But that didn’t mean she had to give up the lifestyle of a homeowner. Wingfield and her three children have managed to stay in a four-bedroom single-family house all to themselves – they just don’t own it.

They’re part of a new class of American renters that has emerged in the wake of the housing bust: people who lost the houses they owned and are now renting single-family homes. Ironically, many of these rental homes are a reflection of the troubles that once plagued the renters. They used to be owned by other families who lost them in the downturn. Now they’re owned and rented out by investors who purchased them at a discount.

At least 1.75 million renters in the U.S. have gone down the same path as Wingfield, according to data from analytics firm CoreLogic.

Wingfield rents her $1,000-a-month home in Goodyear, Ariz., from The Empire Group, a development and investment firm that bought it as a foreclosure. She has a backyard where she’s planted a garden, and she’s on a desirable suburban street lined with quaint homes just eight miles from the house that she owned with her husband.

It’s as if hardly anything has changed.

Feeling Part of the Community

“I am able to provide my daughters and myself a nice home,” Wingfield said. “I don’t have to find a parking spot when I come home, tired from working double shifts at the hospital. I pull my car into the garage and walk into my house.”

Being able to maintain a homeowner’s lifestyle, even as a renter, has also helped her continue to feel like a part of her community.

“You can establish a place in the neighborhood — get a school for your children,” Wingfield said. “The buses run in the neighborhood…. There’s parks and sidewalks to walk your dog.”

Empire, which owns about 1,000 homes in the Phoenix area, spends close to $7,000 a pop to restore each of the distressed properties that it purchases. Its average rental home is 2,100 square feet and goes for $1,050 a month, said Geoffrey Jacobs, a principal at the company.

Jacobs said Empire, which started off as a developer, “put on the investor hat” in 2009. “It was an opportunity for us to take advantage of something we never thought we’d see again,” he said.

Investors provide the capital that Empire needs to convert homes into rentals, and the company turns a profit by taking a cut of the monthly rents that it collects and distributes to investors.

Empire is just one of many firms that are snapping up bargain homes and leasing them to families like Wingfield’s. And with rental rates soaring nationwide, the business strategy is currently lucrative.

As of January, investors are raking in an average 8.6 percent return on their investments annually, according to CoreLogic. That’s a 3 percent increase from 2006. And there are 21 million units in the country’s single-family rental inventory, putting the size of the market at a whopping $3 trillion, CoreLogic said.

That might be a good thing, since millions more borrowers are headed toward foreclosure and may flood the rental market. If that happens, it could continue to push up rental prices and lure more investors into the market, experts have said.

‘Conscientious People’ Coming Out of a Crisis

Many of these single-family renters are like Jacobs’ tenants, whom, he said, are “fairly conscientious people that just went through a foreclosure crisis” and want to retain some semblance of homeownership.

People like Michael Williams, who lives in Memphis, Tenn. When he couldn’t find enough work, he was forced to sell his home in a short sale in 2011 for $110,000 — nearly $40,000 less than he owed on his mortgage. Now he lives in a single-family rental, which costs him $1,025 a month. He said that he feels “blessed” to still be able to reside in a home of his own close to his old neighborhood.

“I’m partial to a home,” he said. “I have my own privacy, and [I also] have grandkids.”

rental housing foreclosed familiesWilliams rents from Memphis Invest, an “REO-to-rental company” that purchases homes in Dallas, Memphis and Phoenix and flips them to “mom-and-pop” investors. REO is real estate parlance for bank-owned properties.

“They’re looking for stability and still have pride of ownership,” said Chris Clothier, a partner with Memphis Invest, of its tenants.

But will these homeowners-turned-renters ever return to homeownership? One possible way back in is through landlords selling their tenants the homes that they occupy. Williams said that his lease agreement stipulates that he could purchase the home he’s living in if his credit score improves and he saves enough for a down payment.

HomeVestors WFI in Stafford, Texas, which manages about 600 rental properties, said it also may offer tenants the opportunity to buy the homes that they occupy.

“We would either sell that home to them or help them how we can,” said Rickey Williams, president of HomeVestors.

In fact, renters of single-family homes may need to be in the position to buy again — and soon. With home prices on the rise, many investors may want to sell, said Jed Kolko, chief economist at listing service Trulia. So if the renters aren’t ready to buy — and recently foreclosed-on homeowners may not be — they’ll have to move.

Still, the boost in the single-family rental inventory has been a positive force, experts have said. They not only offer comfort to once-beleaguered families, but they help to stabilize the housing market by chipping away at the foreclosure inventory.

“It is a good thing for people who need homes to be in homes that need people,” Kolko said.

Why Rental Activity Remains ‘A Bright Spot’ for Housing

By: Tory Barringer

While the lights of the housing market continue to flicker, rental market activity has been a bright spot, said Freddie Mac’s U.S. Economic and Housing Market Outlook for June.

The Enterprise’s report, released Tuesday, showed that newly formed households seem more interested in renting over owning as the economy struggles to get back on its feet. Freddie Mac expects this trend to continue for the near future.

“Further increases in rental demand are likely in the coming year as newly formed households postpone homeownership decisions until the economy strengthens and they have accumulated sufficient savings,” said Frank Nothaft, VP and chief economist for Freddie Mac. “Overall apartment market trends may show further vacancy declines and rent gains, with property values improving as well.”

The report showed that over the year ending March 2012, an additional 1.5 million households moved into rental housing, a 4 percent increase in a year. The Census Bureau has also reported that rental vacancy rates in buildings with at least five apartments have dropped more than two percentage points over the past two years. In addition, both Reis and Axiometrics have reported increases in occupancy rates during the two years through the first quarter of 2012.

Rents have begun to rise in a number of metropolitan areas as rental markets tighten. A broad market measure prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows a rent increase of 2.5 percent during Q1 2012 compared to a year ago. Reis found a 2.8 percent gain in its markets during the same period, while Axiometrics reported a 4 percent rise in nominal rents. However, average rent adjusted for inflation stayed below where it was for most of the decade prior to the Great Recession.

The increase in rental demand has helped enhance property values, on average up about 25 percent during the past two years from the low during Q1 2010. This level is still 14 percent below the pre-Great Recession peak, but the increase has prompted a supply response from developers.

Starts of buildings with at least five apartments have increased 48 percent in the first five months of 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011. The National Association of Home Builders reported that its Multifamily Production Index jumped to its highest reading since 2005, and its index for market-rate rental construction reached its highest level since the series’ start eight years ago. Construction of rental apartments in buildings containing at least five dwellings is expected to add nearly 200,000 in 2012, the highest increase in one year since 2008.

Road Map to a Housing Rebound

By Meg Handley | US News

If you’re a homeowner these days–and almost two thirds of Americans are–the housing market generally doesn’t fall into the realm of pleasant dinner conversation.

The once-booming industry has been bruised and bloodied from nearly every angle: Home prices have plunged 30 percent nationally over the past five years, millions of Americans have lost their homes to foreclosure, and millions more are on the brink with underwater mortgages. Still others are seriously delinquent on their home loans.

Things are bad, maybe the worst they’ve ever been, but there’s likely to be more pain before there are any real gains for the housing market, experts say, primarily because of the giant inventory of homes on the market and the certainty more will be coming through the pipeline over the next few years.

Still, the U.S. economy is resilient. The recovery has absorbed a debt-ceiling fiasco at home, a near financial meltdown in Europe, and political chaos in the Middle East. The job market is also improving, consumers are spending more, and corporate balance sheets remain healthy, all of which are critical for the housing market to rebound.

The remaining puzzle piece is time and how much of it the housing market will need to recover. Here are some other hurdles the housing market needs to overcome before a rebound takes root:

Job growth/broader economic gains. After a bumpy several months, the employment outlook has started to improve, with the private sector adding more than 200,000 jobs in November, according to payroll firm ADP. That’s certainly good news, but we’re not out of the woods yet. The national unemployment rate is still sky high at 9 percent and the pace of job growth needs to double before it translates into the broader economic growth needed to bolster a housing recovery.

“The situation in the housing market is tightly bound with what’s happening in the broader economy,” says Stan Humphries, chief economist at Zillow. “A broader economic recovery is going to have to precede a recovery in housing. Really, job growth is so essential for housing demand.”

Particularly important is the unemployment rate among young Americans between 25 and 34 years old.

“These are the people that are forming households and buying their first homes,” says Jed Kolko, chief economist at Trulia. Due to the bad economy, more young Americans have been “doubling up,” moving in with friends or living at home to ride out lean times. That’s put the kibosh on demand, according to some, which is part of the reason why there’s still so much housing inventory to work through.

Clarity on foreclosure processes. A group of states has banded together to sue lenders and mortgage servicers over what they claim to be improper foreclosure practices. Awaiting rulings in those suits, lenders have held back on foreclosures, slowing the pace and increasing the backlog. The longer it takes to get clarity on how to proceed with foreclosures, the longer it will take to clear that inventory and the longer it will take for housing prices and the broader housing market to recover.

Faster foreclosure processes. Getting homes that are likely to be foreclosed upon or homes that already are in foreclosure to the market is key to exposing the nation’s shadow inventory, which has been keeping prices depressed around the country.

“The longer this goes on, the longer the foreclosure inventory will perpetuate and the longer we’ll be stuck in a rut,” says Anthony Sanders, professor of real estate finance at George Mason University.

The attorneys general investigation has slowed down the foreclosure process, lengthening the time it takes to get delinquent loans through the pipeline and on the market to be sold. But speeding up the foreclosure process is a double-edged sword. More foreclosures will further bloat the housing inventory, driving down prices even more.

But that’s to be expected, says Chris Flanagan, strategist at Bank of America. “The implications of what we’re seeing is that you have to have prices go down before they go up,” he says. “At a minimum, things need to make it through the pipeline. Having it sit there is a dead weight on the economy and it ultimately creates more downside potential because of the backlog.”

Reduced inventory. Next on the to-do list is to clear out the massive housing inventory the United States has. Especially with the influx of homes likely to come on to the market when foreclosure processes finally get ironed out, we’re going to have a lot of stock to deal with. But reducing the supply of homes should help boost prices in the long run, and price appreciation is good for the housing market.

“There really has to be a way to clear the excess inventory out there,” Sanders says. “[Banks and servicers] know how to do it. It’s called lower the price. The problem is they don’t want to lower the price too much because they’re very nervous about taking huge losses.” Huge losses sometimes leave the taxpayer on the hook, making the entire issue intensely political, Sanders adds.

Other experts say the government has a different role, a role facilitating financing for government- and bank-owned properties. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has thrown around a couple of proposals for dealing with these assets, but nothing has been finalized.

“It would help a lot to have some government-sponsored financing of these [properties],” Flanagan says. “It would help them in the end if they allowed more investors to come in.”

Converting foreclosures into sales would help stabilize neighborhoods and home values, Flanagan adds, and, in some cases, improve the availability of rental homes, a sector of the market that has seen an uptick in demand as the foreclosure crisis hit.

Increasing rents. The completion of the cycle comes when rent increases to a point where it’s more attractive to buy a home than to continue renting. With affordability at record levels, when the jobs market recovers and the economy finds its footing, more renters should turn into homeowners, which will reduce the supply of homes and help stabilize prices.

Renting vs. Owning: The Rent Ratio

By Marc Courtenay

The buy-versus-rent question is particularly relevant right now as we see home prices continuing to decline and interest rates on new mortgages also going down to the lowest levels in 60 years.

Back in April of 2010 The New York Times did an impressive job of explaining the ratio that helps define whether it is economically more sensible for residents to buy or rent their housing. Part of the purpose of the article was to help those looking for housing to decide. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/04/20/business/20100420-rent-ratios-table.html

The Times analysis is based on comparing the costs of buying and renting a similar home, using data from Moody’s Economy.com, a research firm, and from real estate agents. This kind of comparison can never tell someone for sure what the best financial move will be. However, it does show whether a buyer will need a big jump in future prices to cover all the costs of owning — including the down payment, closing costs, property taxes, mortgage interest, repairs and co-op fees.

A simple way to do the comparison is to look at something called the rent ratio: the purchase price of a house divided by the annual cost of renting a similar one. The number 20 provides a useful rule of thumb. When you do the math, you discover that a ratio above 20 means you should at least consider renting, especially if you may move again in the next five years or so. When the ratio is well below 20, the case for buying becomes a lot stronger.

In many large metropolitan areas, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta and South Florida, the average ratio is now 16 or lower. It was more than 25 in several of these places at the peak of the bubble, about five years ago. Recently The Times asked Mark Zandi the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics about the chances of yet another housing crash happening and his current analysis of “The Rent Ratio”. His answers are revealing:

Q. I’m struck by how much higher the rent ratio still is in many places, relative to its average from 1990 to 2010. It’s about 18 in Washington (relative to a 1990-2010 average of 13), about 17 in Boston (relative to 15) and 15 across all metropolitan areas (relative to 11). Is there any reason to think the ratio should remain higher in the future than it was in the not-too-distant past? Or should we expect the ratio to continue falling in coming years, either through further house-price declines or through rent increases?

Mr. Zandi: I expect the house-price-to-rent ratio to continue falling at least through the remainder of this year and next. National house prices are set to decline by 5 percent this year, and apartment rents are on track to rise by about 5 percent. I do expect home prices to stabilize in 2012, but rents will continue to rise strongly. Supporting the strong rent growth is declining apartment vacancy rates. Apartment demand is healthy given the better job market and accelerating household formation, particularly among younger households that generally rent, and the ongoing foreclosure crisis which is forcing families from home ownership into renting. Apartment construction is also especially low by historical standards. If this script roughly holds, the house-price-to-rent ratio will be back close to its long-run average in most areas of the country by 2013.

Q. When we were talking earlier, you mentioned that a straight comparison of rents and home prices argues for renting in most places — but that once you consider other factors, the issue becomes a closer call. Can you explain what you meant?

Mr. Zandi: A literal interpretation of the current house-price-to-rent ratio argues that it is still better for most households to rent rather than buy. This suggests that a prospective home buyer might want to wait until house prices fall even more before buying, but there are several important things to consider. Most of the coming house price declines will be for distressed properties — foreclosures and short sales. And timing the precise bottom of house prices is an intrepid affair, and may not the best strategy if the homeowner plans to live in their home for more than a couple of years, as most homeowners do. It is also important to keep in mind that mortgage rates are extraordinarily low, with the rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage currently well below 5 percent. Rates could go lower, but it is unlikely. As the economy continues to gain traction and the Federal Reserve ends its zero interest rate policy, mortgage rates will move higher. Indeed, in a well-functioning economy fixed mortgage rates will be closer to 6 percent.

The entire interview can be found at http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/is-another-housing-crash-coming/?scp=6&sq=rent%20ratio&st=Search The still high price-to-rent ratio means that home buyers shouldn’t be in a rush to buy a home, but owning is quickly looking more attractive, and it won’t be long before owning is once again more financially attractive than renting.

The Explosion In The Number Of Renters Could Help Save The Housing Market

By Meg Handley

(U.S. News & World Report) – It might seem counterintuitive, but increasing rental activity might be the medicine the ailing U.S. housing market needs to get back on its feet.

Virtually every corner of the industry has been languishing since the 2008 financial meltdown, and experts say even if the U.S. manages to contain the domestic impact of the ongoing financial crisis in Europe, the albatross of a weak housing market will continue to drag down the economic recovery stateside.

In short, there will be no economic recovery without a housing recovery.

Experts say the glut of vacant homes is one culprit holding back any meaningful improvements in the housing market.

While it’s normal to have some vacant homes on the market, vacancy rates have skyrocketed over the past few years. Leaving out recreational and occasional-use homes, the rate stood at 7.9 percent according to 2010 Census data, significantly higher than during the bubble, says Jed Kolko, chief economist at real estate information website Trulia.

If nothing is done, the extra inventory will eventually work through the system as the economy gradually recovers and Americans’ financial situations improve, he says, but could more be done to speed up the process and help the housing market?

Some cities have considered bulldozing vacant homes to address excess supply, but the political viability of such a move is questionable on a larger scale. Perhaps more realistically, others have suggested introducing financial incentives for real estate investors to encourage them to purchase vacant homes and convert them into rentals. We’re seeing that to some extent now, says Patrick Newport, economist at IHS Global Insight, but not to the degree it needs to be to make a dent in the huge housing inventory.

But if more investors could be enticed to buy, it could help dry up the excess supply that continues to depress home prices and keep homeowners underwater on their mortgages.”Congress could give investors the incentive to buy vacant houses now by allowing them to write off the value immediately, as long as they hold on to the properties for some number of years and rent them out,” Peter Orszag, vice chairman of global banking at Citigroup and former director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Barack Obama, wrote in a recent column.

While the plan sounds appealing and the cost to taxpayers is relatively small according to Orszag, the geographic and employment trends that track vacancy rates across the country pose a problem—where vacancy rates are high, unemployment also tends to be high. “It might work for vacant homes in some areas, but much of this vacant housing stock is in areas where most renters don’t live,” Kolko says. “And they’re not in locations where there are employment opportunities.”

Reducing the number of vacant home on the market could help treat another disorder afflicting the housing market. Millions of Americans have negative equity in their homes, many of them facing foreclosure and unable to refinance mortgages at lower rates to free up cash. But if a decrease in supply pushes housing prices up, over time homeowners could potentially avoid foreclosure, recoup lost equity, and refinance their mortgages at lower interest rates.

The good news is that the population is growing and there’s a lot of pent up demand for housing. “Many young adults have been doubling up or living with parents,” Kolko says. “There’s also been so little new construction so there are very few brand new units.” The bad news is that without intervention of some sort, the housing market is likely to continue slogging along.

“The government has tried many things and none of them did all that much good,” Newport says. “It’s not clear that there’s that much more the government can do, but it can do something. If it could make it easier for homeowners to refinance that would be good for the housing market, too.”

The jobs report scheduled to be released tomorrow will likely set the tone for the housing market outlook because employment and housing are so intimately connected, Newport says. A big upset could send the housing market even further into the red, while a positive report could keep it stable or provide a small boost.

The new real estate boom: rentals

By Brian Davis

Home prices and sales may be flat, but the rental industry is booming. The percentage of renters is on the rise, the number of households is increasing, and more Americans are downsizing, all of which point in a single direction: rents are on the rise.

At the peak of the housing boom, homeownership in America reached an all-time high at 69.2 percent. Today that number has plummeted to fewer than 67 percent, which may not sound like a huge drop, but that represents roughly 3 million households that were owner-occupied and are now tenant-occupied.

The high foreclosure rate has accelerated the transition toward leasing, but there are a myriad of other trends coalescing to boost demand for rental housing.

For the first time in 40 years, demand has been shifting toward smaller dwellings, coinciding with a shift in demand toward urban centers. Baby boomers are considering downsizing, moving toward areas with more amenities, and members of Generation Y are just hitting their single, urban-living years.

Only the relatively small Generation X is in the buy-a-large-house-in-suburbs category, which means the demand for the traditional single-family home with a white picket fence is weak.

The number of households in the U.S. was artificially stifled during the “Great Recession,” as people took on roommates, moved in with family, or remained with their parents longer than they would have otherwise.

It’s estimated that 1.2 million young adults moved back with their parents from 2005-10, which does not include the number of adults who moved in with roommates or those who would have moved out of their parents’ houses but didn’t because the economy was so bad.

Now, however, these artificially joined households are separating, the vast majority starting with a lease agreement.

Rental vacancy rates are sharply on the decline as well. In the first quarter of 2011, rental vacancy rates had dropped to 6.2 percent, according to Reis Inc., which tracks nationwide residency data. This figure is down sharply from the 8 percent vacancy rate just one year earlier.

That, of course, means that rents are on the rise. Reis tracks data for 82 metropolitan areas in America, and of those, 75 experienced increased rents from early 2010 to early 2011. Furthermore, the nationwide average rental amount rose from $967 in early 2010 to $991 in 2011.

Each of these indicators are entire topics in themselves, but the bottom line is that the rental industry is on the rise, and some real estate experts believe that its growth will accelerate rapidly over the next three to five years.

Apartment-building construction is already responding to the growing demand for rental housing, but with so many construction firms either out of business or licking their wounds, it’s anticipated that there will be a rental housing shortage in many major cities around the country over the next few years.

Rentals hold key to real estate market’s future

By Mary Umberger

Cheryl Russell has one word for anyone who’s adrift and looking for any direction in real estate, so long as it’s up: rentals.

The rental market is “a possible savior for many segments of the housing market,” said Russell, a demographer who specializes in studying Americans’ housing and spending habits.

To say that Russell isn’t particularly encouraging about the near-term prospects for the housing industry would be an understatement.

Having crunched mountains of census and other data to glean the habits and attitudes of groups of actual and potential homeowners, from 20-somethings to retirees, she finds them generally scared off or stuck, and predicted they’ll stay that way for two decades to come.

Russell’s company, New Strategist Publications, recently published its third edition of “Americans and Their Homes: Demographics of Homeownership.” It’s not the stuff that you’re likely to lose yourself in at the beach — unless, of course, you’re another demographer. It’s a pricey ($90 to $270, depending on the version) festival of numbers and spreadsheets, delving into such arcania as how many black householders are 45 or older, or how many people use oil to heat their homes.

“It’s mostly purchased by libraries, as a hardcover book or downloadable” said Russell, who was the editor of the widely regarded American Demographics magazine in the 1980s and 1990s, and later of the Boomer Report, a journal of the behavior of America’s most influential age group.

Tweeting as @TrendCop and writing an engaging, frequently updated blog, Demo Memo, the self-described know-it-all offers up revealing data nuggets and interpretations about consumer behavior — the kind of stuff to trot at a cocktail party when all else fails.

Such as: Older Americans might not be the penny-pinchers they’re portrayed to be, she writes — they spend close to the national average on goods and services, including such “youth” items as entertainment and women’s clothes. Or: The average number of jobs Americans have held by age 45 is 11.

But scratching down to the deeper, economic meaning of cultural numbers is her main interest, and Russell said she’s long been puzzled why the housing industry, in her experience, has so little interest in demographics, the study of population trends.

“There are many things they would have been prepared for, and not surprised about,” when the bubble burst, she said.

The most telling indicator of the unsustainability of the housing boom was the complete misalignment of household income and home-price growth, which she wrote about at the time, she said.

“In the 1990s, everything looked rosy. You had boomers aging into peak homebuying groups, she said. “I predicted at the time that we’d see record-high homeownership, and we did.

“Then they juiced it with easy mortgage money, and obviously we got the housing bubble out of it,” she said. “It boosted the homeownership rate to a much higher level than it would have naturally gone. Based on the demographics, it still would have been a good market even without (the easing of the lending standards).”

Currently, she’s quite blunt in her demographically based opinion that there’s little in housing to be encouraged about.

“Every single generation in the homeownership market is a negative now,” she said. “Every age group is sidelined now.”

She ticks off the conundrums of the individual age cohorts:

“The group that’s 25 to 29 … they’re deciding not to buy, or they’re not as ready to buy or are less able to buy than previous cohorts were in that age group,” she said.

“I can’t tell you their specific motivations, but I can tell you the demographics behind their motivations,” Russell said. “High unemployment rate and job uncertainty are making people afraid to make a large financial commitments, and the mortgage regulations have gotten stricter.”

The 30-34 age group is the most worrisome to her because those in this group are prime homebuying age — and are the most likely to be underwater, Russell said. From 2004-10 the homeownership rate of householders in this group fell more than any other — and it’s still falling. In the second quarter, it slipped below 50 percent for only the second time since the (federal) data series began in the early 1990s, Russell said.

The big bogeyman for both of these prime homebuying groups, she said, is student debt.

“About 35 percent of people under 35 have student debt — that’s huge,” she said. “I think the average debt load is about $23,000 among debtors. If you have student loans and a car loan, it’s going to be hard to take on mortgage debt.

“And it’s a number that’s going up,” she said. “You’d think there would be a turnaround” with people unable to afford to go to school in this economy.

“But people seem so frantic to get a college degree that it hasn’t turned around yet,” she said.

“The problem for the baby boomers (born after World War II through the mid-1960s) is that they can’t move,” she said. “You have this pent-up desire among them to move — 32 percent of those who are 64 and older say they want to move when they retire, but if they sell they’ll have to sell for a lower price” than they’re expecting.

“As you move up to the older generation, a lot of them have mortgages,” Russell said. “The percent of people who are 65-plus who have mortgages has increased to 27 percent. That’s a high number. It went up from 18 percent in 1999. Many of these people are going to be struggling with mortgage payments.”

The emerging group that the housing industry should be focusing on now, Russell said, is renters. She’s hardly the first to point out the rise of the renter class, but she notes a divergence in the profiles among those who are renting now or will be soon, and sees an emerging market.

“Renters are interesting because you have the stereotypical renter, who is generally lower-income,” she said. “But now you’ve got a new type of renter who may be a young couple, with a little bit more money, and they’re educated and they’re choosing to rent rather than buy.

She foresees a demand for single-family rentals for these tenants, as well as for those who want roommate relationships — but with comfort.

“I think a lot of rental units should be rehabbed to make room for roommates, with two master bedroom units or three,” she said. The big question mark, however, is whether and when young adults will feel financially secure enough to walk away from doubling-up with their parents.

If it happens, demand for such properties might be a ticket out for boomers who currently feel stuck in their homes, Russell said.

“If I were a property manager or a real estate agent, I’d be getting into providing service for them,” she said. “I’d be saying, ‘Are you stuck in your house? Can’t sell? Let me help you rent, and you can move wherever you want.’

“You round up a troupe of people who can go into these houses and prepare them for rentals. You tell the boomers, ‘Come to us. We will give you an analysis, we will do the work and we will manage it for you,” she said.

Or think of something, she urged.

“Everybody’s holding their breath and waiting for the market to return, and it’s not going to happen,” she said. “For the next 20 years, we’re going to be living with negative demographics and adjusting to a lower standard of living.

“The whole housing industry has to look at new ways to grow.”

Investors turning more properties into rentals

By Kerri Panchuk

Investors are pulling back from the housing market as the flipping model loses speed on weak homebuyer demand, according to the latest Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance survey.

The HousingPulse Tracking Survey showed demand for properties is low, forcing investors to rent out half the homes they acquire. With few investors satisfied with this model, July investor activity declined, making it the third consecutive monthly drop.

Investors accounted for 19.6% of home purchases last month, down from 23% in April and the lowest level in the 12 months.

Survey results showed the proportion of first-time buyers did rise to 36.9% last month from 35.4% in June. Campbell surveys concluded current homeowners are unlikely to acquire distressed properties, creating a situation where recovery still depends on investor activity.

“The inability of most investors to resell homes in the current housing environment has put a damper on their participation in the housing market this summer,” according to Campbell.

Of the properties acquired by investors in July, 48% will be turned into rentals for now, according to the Campbell report. A year ago, only 28% of properties acquired by investors were kept as rentals.

Housing Inventory Declines but Slow Sales Pace Adds Staying Power

By Carrie Bay

There were 3.65 million existing-homes available for sale at the end of July, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

That tally is down 1.7 percent from June, but the time it will take to clear the supply from the market has lengthened from 9.2 months in June to 9.4 months in July, because sales have slowed considerably over the summer months.

NAR reported Thursday that completed sales transactions for existing homes fell 3.5 percent in July to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.67 million. That’s down from an annual rate of 4.84 million in June.

NAR says the latest numbers are “notably higher” than a year earlier, in fact 21 percent above the 3.86 million unit pace in July 2010. But when you put it into context, July of last year represented a cyclical low for homes sales as it bore the immediate brunt of the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit.

In fact, according to a Twitter posting from the Wall Street Journal’s Nick Timiraos, July 2010 was the worst July for home sales since 1997; this July is the second worst.

NAR says the national median existing-home price for all housing types was $174,000 in July, down 4.4 percent from July 2010.

Short sales and REOs, typically offloaded at a discount, accounted for 29 percent of last month’s sales, compared with 30 percent in June and 32 percent in July 2010. As recently as April, distressed properties claimed a 40 percent share of existing-homes sales.

NAR’s chief economist Lawrence Yun blames the declining sales volume on the “tug and pull” of today’s market. He says while housing affordability conditions this year has been the best on record, dating back to 1970, many buyers are being held back because of tight credit conditions.

“[B]anks are offering financing to only the most highly qualified borrowers, ignoring a large share of otherwise creditworthy buyers,” Yun said. “Those potential buyers represent the difference between an uneven recovery and a much more robust housing market that could stimulate additional economic activity and create jobs.”

NAR also noted that contract cancellations remain high. Sixteen percent of the trade group’s members reported that at least one sales contract fell through in July.

In addition, 9 percent of Realtors said a contract was delayed in the past three months due to low appraisals, and another 13 percent said a contract was renegotiated to a lower sales price because an appraisal was below the initially agreed amount.

Commenting on NAR’s latest report, Patrick Newport, U.S. economist for IHS Global Insight, said, “Two months ago, the press release blamed weather and tight credit for the low figures. Last month, cancellations and (again) tight credit were the culprits. This month, cancellations (again) and low appraisal values are the culprits.”

Newport says weak demand is the key reason sales are down. He cites commentary from the Mortgage Bankers Association that potential homebuyers seem hesitant to purchase in this highly volatile and uncertain environment, and he says if this is indeed the case, “we could see ugly existing home sales numbers in August.”

According to NAR, all-cash sales accounted for 29 percent of transactions in July, unchanged from June. Investors account for the bulk of cash purchases.

First-time buyers purchased 32 percent of homes in July, while investors accounted for 18 percent of total sales. The balance of sales was to repeat buyers, which were a 50 percent market share in July.

Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist with the research firm Capital Economics, says the 3.5 percent month-over-month drop in existing-home sales for July shows that the housing market will not pull the U.S. economy out of its current malaise.

“In fact, with home sales now 13.5 percent below January’s level is it becoming clear that the economic slowdown and drop in confidence is hitting housing demand,” Dales said.